Difference between revisions of "Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group I"

From Kumu Wiki - TRU
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=''E. (Mrs.) v. Eve'', [1986] 2 S.C.R. 388=
 
=''E. (Mrs.) v. Eve'', [1986] 2 S.C.R. 388=
  
This page considers and discusses how a variety of dominant theoretical legal perspectives, illustrate and explain the key issues in the case ''E. (Mrs.) v. Eve'', and how the approaches taken by the court parallels and contrasts with these various perspectives. The theoretical perspectives to be discussed are as follows:
+
This page considers and discusses how a variety of dominant theoretical legal perspectives illustrate and explain the key issues in the case ''E. (Mrs.) v. Eve'', and how the approaches taken by the court parallels and contrasts with these various perspectives. The theoretical perspectives to be discussed are as follows:
  
 +
<div align="center">
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|-
 
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example
+
| [[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Natural_Law | Natural Law]] || [[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Positivism | Positivism]] || [[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Separation_Thesis | Separation Thesis]] || [[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/System_Of_Rights | System of Rights]] || [[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Liberty-Paternalism | Liberty-Paternalism]] || [[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Law_As_Efficiency | Law as Efficiency]] || [[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Feminist_Jurisprudence | Feminist Jurisprudence]]
|-
 
| Example || Example || Example || Example
 
 
|}
 
|}
 +
</div>
  
 
[[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Natural_Law]]
 
[[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Natural_Law]]
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
[[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Critical_Legal_Studies_Critical_Race_Theory]]
 
[[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Critical_Legal_Studies_Critical_Race_Theory]]
 
[[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Natural_Law | Natural Law]]
 

Revision as of 09:11, 21 March 2014

E. (Mrs.) v. Eve, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 388

This page considers and discusses how a variety of dominant theoretical legal perspectives illustrate and explain the key issues in the case E. (Mrs.) v. Eve, and how the approaches taken by the court parallels and contrasts with these various perspectives. The theoretical perspectives to be discussed are as follows:

Natural Law Positivism Separation Thesis System of Rights Liberty-Paternalism Law as Efficiency Feminist Jurisprudence

Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Natural_Law

Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Positivism

Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Separation_Thesis

Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/System_Of_Rights

Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Liberty-Paternalism

Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Law_As_Efficiency

Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Feminist_Jurisprudence

Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Critical_Legal_Studies_Critical_Race_Theory