Difference between revisions of "Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group C"
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
The Tribunal ordered that the Moore family be reimbursed for the costs of Jeffrey’s private school tuition and $10,000.00 in damages for pain and suffering. Further, the Tribunal ordered a wide range of sweeping systemic remedies against both the school district and province. | The Tribunal ordered that the Moore family be reimbursed for the costs of Jeffrey’s private school tuition and $10,000.00 in damages for pain and suffering. Further, the Tribunal ordered a wide range of sweeping systemic remedies against both the school district and province. | ||
− | ==== British Columbia | + | ==== Supreme Court of British Columbia Judicial Review ==== |
− | + | Upon Judicial Review, the Supreme Court of British Columbia found that the Tribunal had erred in comparing Jeffrey’s situation to that of the general student population, asserting that the proper comparative group is that of other special needs students. | |
+ | |||
+ | The Tribunal decision was set aside. | ||
==== British Columbia Court of Appeal ==== | ==== British Columbia Court of Appeal ==== |
Revision as of 02:37, 21 March 2014
Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61
Facts
Jeffrey Moore suffered from a severe learning disability, dyslexia, and required intensive remedial instruction. In the early stages of schooling, Jeffrey received assistance with his disability within the public school system. It was eventually determined that Jeffrey required further intensive remedial instruction outside the public school system at the local Diagnostic Centre; however, due to government cutbacks, the Diagnostic Centre was set to be closed and the assistance Jeffrey required was only available via the private school system. Jeffrey consequently completed his schooling at various private schools specializing in teaching children with learning disabilities.
Jeffery's father, Frederick Moore, subsequently filed a human rights complaint against School District No. 44 (North Vancouver)and the British Columbia Ministry of Education claiming a violation of section 8 of the British Columbia Human Rights Code, on the grounds that Jeffrey had suffered discrimination and had been denied a 'service' customarily available to the public, an education.
Judicial History
British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal
The Tribunal agreed with expert and witness opinion that Jeffrey required intensive remedial instruction to assist with his disability. The Tribunal found both individual discrimination against Jeffrey and systemic discrimination by the school district and province of British Columbia.
Findings of Discrimination by the District
The Tribunal found individual discrimination in violation of the Human Rights Code against Jeffrey by the school district, as a result of:
- The school district’s failure to assess Jeffrey’s learning disability early; and
- The school district’s failure to provide appropriate intensive remedial instruction following the closing of the Diagnostic Centre.
The Tribunal found systemic discrimination in violation of the Human Rights Code against students with severe learning disabilities by the school district, as a result of:
- The school district’s underfunding of severe learning disability programs;
- The school district’s decision to close the Diagnostic Centre; and
- The school district’s inability to consider reasonable alternatives for disabled student before cutting available services despite financial constraints.
Findings of Discrimination by the Province
The Tribunal found systemic discrimination in violation of the Human Rights Code against students with severe learning disabilities by the province of British Columbia, as result of four administration problems, namely:
- The creation of the high incidence/low cost cap classification for special education funding;
- The underfunding of the school district;
- Failure to ensure necessary services, including early intervention, as mandatory for students with disabilities; and
- Failure to monitor the activities conducted by the school districts.
Remedies
The Tribunal ordered that the Moore family be reimbursed for the costs of Jeffrey’s private school tuition and $10,000.00 in damages for pain and suffering. Further, the Tribunal ordered a wide range of sweeping systemic remedies against both the school district and province.
Supreme Court of British Columbia Judicial Review
Upon Judicial Review, the Supreme Court of British Columbia found that the Tribunal had erred in comparing Jeffrey’s situation to that of the general student population, asserting that the proper comparative group is that of other special needs students.
The Tribunal decision was set aside.
British Columbia Court of Appeal
The judicial review decision was appealed. The Court of Appeal agreed with the decision that the correct comparator group was other special needs students, dismissing the appeal. This decision was appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Supreme Court of Canada
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_C/Natural_Law
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_C/Positivism
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_C/Separation_Thesis
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_C/System_Of_Rights
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_C/Liberty-Paternalism
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_C/Law_As_Efficiency
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_C/Feminist_Jurisprudence
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_C/Critical_Legal_Studies_Critical_Race_Theory