Difference between revisions of "Course:Law3020/2014WT1"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== LAW 3020: Legal Perspectives == | == LAW 3020: Legal Perspectives == | ||
| − | The class has been divided into 24 wiki groups (A through X). Please refer to the | + | The class has been divided into 24 wiki groups (A through X). Please refer to the list below, to see the group to which you've been assigned, and which case has been assigned to your discussion/wiki group (A-X). |
Over the course of the term, each group will build a “wiki” entry around their assigned case. Your wiki will consider and discuss how each of the theoretical perspectives covered in this course applies to, illustrates, and explains the key issues in your case, and the approach that was taken by the court. At the conclusion of the wiki assignment, each group will have built a complete wiki entry that examines “their” case from all of the theoretical perspectives that we have covered in this course, including a discussion of any relevant comparisons between them (eg.” A legal positivist would say X, because of Y; a legal realist, on the other hand, would find Y to be an illusion, identifying the most significant factor as A, and the most valuable outcome as B, because…..”) The objective is that your final wiki entry should engage these theoretical perspectives with one another, as opposed to comprising a mere listing of theories. The class structure has been adopted to facilitate the ongoing development of your wiki. | Over the course of the term, each group will build a “wiki” entry around their assigned case. Your wiki will consider and discuss how each of the theoretical perspectives covered in this course applies to, illustrates, and explains the key issues in your case, and the approach that was taken by the court. At the conclusion of the wiki assignment, each group will have built a complete wiki entry that examines “their” case from all of the theoretical perspectives that we have covered in this course, including a discussion of any relevant comparisons between them (eg.” A legal positivist would say X, because of Y; a legal realist, on the other hand, would find Y to be an illusion, identifying the most significant factor as A, and the most valuable outcome as B, because…..”) The objective is that your final wiki entry should engage these theoretical perspectives with one another, as opposed to comprising a mere listing of theories. The class structure has been adopted to facilitate the ongoing development of your wiki. | ||
Revision as of 16:08, 16 January 2014
LAW 3020: Legal Perspectives
The class has been divided into 24 wiki groups (A through X). Please refer to the list below, to see the group to which you've been assigned, and which case has been assigned to your discussion/wiki group (A-X).
Over the course of the term, each group will build a “wiki” entry around their assigned case. Your wiki will consider and discuss how each of the theoretical perspectives covered in this course applies to, illustrates, and explains the key issues in your case, and the approach that was taken by the court. At the conclusion of the wiki assignment, each group will have built a complete wiki entry that examines “their” case from all of the theoretical perspectives that we have covered in this course, including a discussion of any relevant comparisons between them (eg.” A legal positivist would say X, because of Y; a legal realist, on the other hand, would find Y to be an illusion, identifying the most significant factor as A, and the most valuable outcome as B, because…..”) The objective is that your final wiki entry should engage these theoretical perspectives with one another, as opposed to comprising a mere listing of theories. The class structure has been adopted to facilitate the ongoing development of your wiki.
The mark for the wiki will be a group mark, and class time has been set aside for you to work on this assignment together. Contributions to the wiki should also be made outside of this designated class time, and may be made by individuals working together or separately (entries are track-able by the professor). The designated class time provides you with an opportunity to discuss and agree to any changes that have been made to the wiki since the last class meeting, in addition to discussing how the theoretical perspective discussed that week relates to “your” case. You are expected to refer to the materials that have been assigned for class; you may also access additional materials and refer to them in your wiki entry. The objective is to make your wiki entry the best it can possibly be.
If you have any technological questions or concerns relating to the wiki assignment, please contact Brian Lamb, Director of Innovation at: blamb@tru.ca
Wiki groups
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_A: Cuthbertson v. Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53
Ramez Alam, Ravneet Arora, Geea Atanase, Coral Atanase
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_B: Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2013 SCC 72
Harmanpreet Bains, Sofia Bakken, Jeanine Ball, Courtney Barber
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_C: Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61
Steven Bereck, Bethan Buchanan, Jackson Bullock, Nora Butler, Jennifer Cao
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_D: Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624
Nicole Chang, Mario Checcia, Lorraine Chow, Sabah Christopher
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_E: K.L.B. v. British Columbia, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 403
Robyn Cooper, Douglas Cottier, Michael Cunningham, Raman Dahia
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_F: A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 181
Zachary Davis, Corey Davison, Amandeep Dhesi, Ajit Dhillon
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_G: Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 791, 2005 SCC 35
Dustin Ellis, Kass Freeman, Sarah Fullbrook, Christopher Gall
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_H: R. v. O'Connor, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411
Taranpreet Gill, Karianne Good, Casey Goodrich, Tracey Greer
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I: E. (Mrs.) v. Eve, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 388
Ryan Griffin, Ryan Hamilton, Olivia Harvey, Stephanie Head
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_J: Canada (Attorney General) v. PHS Community Services Society, 2011 SCC 44, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 134
Aasim Hirji, Vanessa Hope, Brian Howarth, Neila Howes
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_K: R. v. Khawaja, 2012 SCC 69, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 555
Daniel Hutchinson, Kimberly Jensen, Jennifer Jones, Salman Karim
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_L: Geffen v. Goodman Estate, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 353
Star Khasa, Sheridan King, Stephen Kroeger, Jessica Kruhlak
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group M: Hodgkinson v. Simms, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 377
Rachel LaGroix, Stephanie Leong, Justin Livingstone, Jeremy Maddock
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group N: B(R) v Children’s Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, [1995] 1 S.C.R.
Sean Manery, Sarah Marsh, Krista Masleck, Robert Mazzarolo
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group O: Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24
Leigh McFadden, Alan McKenzie, James McLeod, Kenneth McLeod
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group P: Egan v. Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 513
Kelly Melnyk, Cassandra Milne, Ryan Monty, Kenna Morris
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group Q: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.), [1997] 3 SCR 925
Jaysan Namasivyam, Natasha Nair, Danielle Oliver, Alexander Paterson
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group R: B.M. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2004 BCCA 402
Micheal Pavlic, Stephanie Penkala, Gosia Piasecka, Marshall Putnam
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group S: Granovsky v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), 2000 SCC 28
Tajinder Rathor, Toby Rauch-Davis, Cole Rodocker, Nick Rogic
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group T: Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2000 SCC 69
Keegan Rutherford, Houtan Sanandaji, Michael Scott, Paul Sekhon
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group U: Trinity Western University v. British Columbia College of Teachers, 2001 SCC 31
Onkar Sohi, Nikta Shirazian, Brett Squair, Michelle Tang
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group V: R. v. A.D.H., 2013 SCC 28
Claire Vikse, Ian Walker, Crystal Wariach, Rob Wasilew
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_W: Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69
Stephen Whitehead, John Wiebe, Jeff Wong, Winston Woo
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group X: E.B. v. Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia, 2005 SCC 60
Alexander Wright, Harmandeep Toor, Leah Senevirante, Dennis Rose