Course:Law3020/2014WT1

LAW 3020: Legal Perspectives

The class has been divided into 24 wiki groups (A through X). Please refer to the “Course Schedule, Content and Readings”, below, to see which case has been assigned to your discussion/wiki group (A-X). Groups and members are listed following the “Course Schedule, Content and Readings.”

Over the course of the term, each group will build a “wiki” entry around their assigned case. Your wiki will consider and discuss how each of the theoretical perspectives covered in this course applies to, illustrates, and explains the key issues in your case, and the approach that was taken by the court. At the conclusion of the wiki assignment, each group will have built a complete wiki entry that examines “their” case from all of the theoretical perspectives that we have covered in this course, including a discussion of any relevant comparisons between them (eg.” A legal positivist would say X, because of Y; a legal realist, on the other hand, would find Y to be an illusion, identifying the most significant factor as A, and the most valuable outcome as B, because…..”) The objective is that your final wiki entry should engage these theoretical perspectives with one another, as opposed to comprising a mere listing of theories. The class structure has been adopted to facilitate the ongoing development of your wiki.

The mark for the wiki will be a group mark, and class time has been set aside for you to work on this assignment together. Contributions to the wiki should also be made outside of this designated class time, and may be made by individuals working together or separately (entries are track-able by the professor). The designated class time provides you with an opportunity to discuss and agree to any changes that have been made to the wiki since the last class meeting, in addition to discussing how the theoretical perspective discussed that week relates to “your” case. You are expected to refer to the materials that have been assigned for class; you may also access additional materials and refer to them in your wiki entry. The objective is to make your wiki entry the best it can possibly be.

If you have any technological questions or concerns relating to the wiki assignment, please contact Brian Lamb, Director of Innovation at: blamb@tru.ca

Wiki groups

Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_A: Cuthbertson v. Rasouli, 2013 SCC 53

Ramez Alam, Ravneet Arora, Geea Atanase, Coral Atanase

Group B: Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2013 SCC 72

Harmanpreet Bains Sofia Bakken Jeanine Ball Courtney Barber

Group C: Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 Steven Bereck Bethan Buchanan Jackson Bullock Nora Butler Jennifer Cao

Group D: Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624 Nicole Chang Mario Checcia Lorraine Chow Sabah Christopher

Group E: K.L.B. v. British Columbia, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 403

Robyn Cooper Douglas Cottier Michael Cunningham Raman Dahia

Group F: A.C. v. Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 181 Zachary Davis Corey Davison Amandeep Dhesi Ajit Dhillon

Group G: Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 791, 2005 SCC 35

Dustin Ellis Kass Freeman Sarah Fullbrook Christopher Gall

Group H: R. v. O'Connor, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411

Taranpreet Gill Karianne Good Casey Goodrich Tracey Greer

Group I: E. (Mrs.) v. Eve, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 388

Ryan Griffin Ryan Hamilton Olivia Harvey Stephanie Head

Group J: Canada (Attorney General) v. PHS Community Services Society, 2011 SCC 44, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 134 Aasim Hirji Vanessa Hope Brian Howarth Neila Howes

Group K: R. v. Khawaja, 2012 SCC 69, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 555

Daniel Hutchinson Kimberly Jensen Jennifer Jones Salman Karim

Group L: Geffen v. Goodman Estate, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 353

Star Khasa Sheridan King Stephen Kroeger Jessica Kruhlak

Group M: Hodgkinson v. Simms, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 377 Rachel LaGroix Stephanie Leong Justin Livingstone Jeremy Maddock

Group N: B(R) v Children’s Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto, [1995] 1 S.C.R. Sean Manery Sarah Marsh Krista Masleck Robert Mazzarolo

Group O: Alberta v. Elder Advocates of Alberta Society, 2011 SCC 24 Leigh McFadden Alan McKenzie James McLeod Kenneth McLeod

Group P: Egan v. Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 513 Kelly Melnyk Cassandra Milne Ryan Monty Kenna Morris

Group Q: Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.), [1997] 3 SCR 925 Jaysan Namasivyam Natasha Nair Danielle Oliver Alexander Paterson

Group R: B.M. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2004 BCCA 402 Micheal Pavlic Stephanie Penkala Gosia Piasecka Marshall Putnam

Group S: Granovsky v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), 2000 SCC 28 Tajinder Rathor Toby Rauch-Davis Cole Rodocker Nick Rogic

Group T: Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2000 SCC 69 Keegan Rutherford Houtan Sanandaji Michael Scott Paul Sekhon

Group U: Trinity Western University v. British Columbia College of Teachers, 2001 SCC 31 Onkar Sohi Nikta Shirazian Brett Squair Michelle Tang

Group V: R. v. A.D.H., 2013 SCC 28 Claire Vikse Ian Walker Crystal Wariach Rob Wasilew

Group W: Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 Stephen Whitehead John Wiebe Jeff Wong Winston Woo

Group X: E.B. v. Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia, 2005 SCC 60 Alexander Wright Harmandeep Toor Leah Senevirante Dennis Rose