Difference between revisions of "Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group O"

From Kumu Wiki - TRU
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
 
! B
 
! B
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Positivism Legal Positivism]
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Positivism Legal Positivism]
| John Austing, HLA Hart, Jeremy Benthm, Joseph Raz
+
| John Austin, HLA Hart, Jeremy Bentham, Joseph Raz
 
!  
 
!  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! C
 
! C
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Separation_Thesis Separation Theory]
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Separation_Thesis Separation Theory]
 +
| HLA Hart, Ron Fuller
 
!  
 
!  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! D
 
! D
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/System_Of_Rights System of Rights]
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/System_Of_Rights System of Rights]
| [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Dworkin Ronald Dworkin]
+
| Ronald Dworkin
 
!  
 
!  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! E
 
! E
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Liberty-Paternalism Liberty and Paternalism]
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Liberty-Paternalism Liberty and Paternalism]
| [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill John Stuart Mill] & [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Dworkin Gerald Dworkin]]
+
| John Stuart Mill and Gerald Dworkin
 
!  
 
!  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! F
 
! F
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Law_As_Efficiency Law as Efficiency]
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Law_As_Efficiency Law as Efficiency]
| [http://people.laps.yorku.ca/people.nsf/researcherprofile?readform&shortname=dimock Susan Dimock]
+
| Susan Dimock
 
!  
 
!  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! G
 
! G
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Feminist_Jurisprudence Feminist Jurisprudence]
 
| [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Feminist_Jurisprudence Feminist Jurisprudence]
| Patricia Smith & Catharine A. Mackinnon
+
| Patricia Smith and Catharine Mackinnon
 
{{!}}-
 
{{!}}-
 
! colspan="6" style="background:#ddd;" {{!}} [[http://www.tru.ca/law/faculty-staff/faculty/margaretisabelhall.html Professor Margaret Hall]]
 
! colspan="6" style="background:#ddd;" {{!}} [[http://www.tru.ca/law/faculty-staff/faculty/margaretisabelhall.html Professor Margaret Hall]]
 
{{!}}-
 
{{!}}-

Revision as of 14:54, 24 March 2014

Alberta v Elder Advocates of Alberta Society

Flag of Alberta [1]

Introduction

This Wiki page will provide a general overview of the case of Alberta v Elder Advocates of Alberta Society. The Case Brief will follow and at the bottom of the page you will find links to the pages that relate the facts of this case to different legal theorists.

Facts

Issues

  1. Whether the disputed claims disclose a cause of action, assuming the facts pleaded to be true?
  2. Whether principles of fiduciary duty applicable to private actors apply to governments?
  3. Whether government owed fiduciary duty to patients?
  4. Whether government breached s.15(1) (equality) of the Charter?

Ratio

Analysis

Held

Please click on the links below to access the respective theoretical approach

Created by X1,X2,[X3], X4
Legal Perspectives Legal Philosophers
A Natural Law Thomas Aquinas
B Legal Positivism John Austin, HLA Hart, Jeremy Bentham, Joseph Raz
C Separation Theory HLA Hart, Ron Fuller
D System of Rights Ronald Dworkin
E Liberty and Paternalism John Stuart Mill and Gerald Dworkin
F Law as Efficiency Susan Dimock
G Feminist Jurisprudence Patricia Smith and Catharine Mackinnon
[Professor Margaret Hall]