Difference between revisions of "Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group O"

Revision as of 14:59, 24 March 2014

Alberta v Elder Advocates of Alberta Society

Flag of Alberta [1]

Introduction

This Wiki page will provide a general overview of the case of Alberta v Elder Advocates of Alberta Society. The Case Brief will follow and at the bottom of the page you will find links to the pages that relate the facts of this case to different legal theorists.

Facts

Issues

Whether the disputed claims disclose a cause of action, assuming the facts pleaded to be true?
Whether principles of fiduciary duty applicable to private actors apply to governments?
Whether government owed fiduciary duty to patients?
Whether government breached s.15(1) (equality) of the Charter?

Ratio

Analysis

Held

Please click on the links below to access the respective theoretical approach

{ |! colspan="1" style="background:#ddd;" | Legal Perspectives |- |! colspan="2" style="background:#ddd;" | Legal Philosophers |- ! | Natural Law | Thomas Aquinas ! |- ! B | Legal Positivism | John Austin, HLA Hart, Jeremy Bentham, Joseph Raz ! |- ! C | Separation Theory | HLA Hart, Ron Fuller ! |- ! D | System of Rights | Ronald Dworkin ! |- ! E | Liberty and Paternalism | John Stuart Mill and Gerald Dworkin ! |- ! F | Law as Efficiency | Susan Dimock ! |- ! G | Feminist Jurisprudence | Patricia Smith and Catharine Mackinnon |-

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 === Please click on the links below to access the respective theoretical approach ===
-{|! colspan="1" style="background:#ddd;" | [[Legal Perspectives]]
+{
-! colspan="2" style="background:#ddd;" | [[Legal Philosophers]]
+|! colspan="1" style="background:#ddd;" | [[Legal Perspectives]]
 |-
-! A
+|! colspan="2" style="background:#ddd;" | [[Legal Philosophers]]
+|-
+!
 | [http://kumu.tru.ca/Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_O/Natural_Law Natural Law]
 | Thomas Aquinas