Difference between revisions of "Documentation:Course Delivery Requirements/meetings"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== October 20, 2014 === | === October 20, 2014 === | ||
==Project framework discussion == | ==Project framework discussion == | ||
| − | '''Present''' - Naomi, Carolyn, Michelle, Irwin | + | '''Present''' - Naomi, Carolyn, Michelle, Irwin <br> |
'''Framework discussion''' | '''Framework discussion''' | ||
| − | Purpose - ideas for project framework | + | Purpose - ideas for project framework - comments welcome - please use disscussion page <br> |
| − | + | In no particular order ... | |
| − | + | * Purpose - big picture vision and connection to TRU strategic goals and priorities - e.g. flexible learning, open learning methods and OER | |
| − | + | * Timelines, roles and responsibilties | |
| − | + | * Problem statement re status quo | |
| − | + | * Environmental scan - LMS futures, textbook publishers, privacy, open educational practices, hardware devices, student trends, open source software | |
| − | + | * SWOT analysis e.g. existing strengths and weaknesses of current model of development and delivery (OL, campus) | |
| − | + | * High level goals/criteria and priorities | |
| − | + | * Needs analysis | |
| − | + | * Design approach - early iterations and feedback? Test environment? Decision points to launch larger project? Buy vs build, hybrid? Proprietary vs open? Etc.... | |
| − | + | * Functional requirements | |
| − | + | * Methodology stakeholder engagement - transparency | |
| − | + | * Assumptions and constraints e.g. range of options to be considered within scope of study | |
| − | + | * Available resources | |
| − | + | * Existing/historical resources and efforts | |
| − | + | * Stakeholder analysis | |
| − | + | * Use cases | |
| − | + | * UI design considerations | |
| − | + | * Scope of pilot | |
| − | + | * Acceptance criteria/testing cycles/reviewers | |
| − | + | * Training and support for stakeholders | |
| − | + | * Resources for implementation and scaling | |
| − | + | * Review of similar processes (e.g. SFU, JIBC, Fishbone - U Calgary D'Arcy Norman | |
| − | + | * Project governance/structure (org chart)& decision matrix | |
| + | * Documentation including GANTT chart, critical path, resources, timelines, milestones | ||
Latest revision as of 14:57, 20 October 2014
October 20, 2014
Project framework discussion
Present - Naomi, Carolyn, Michelle, Irwin
Framework discussion
Purpose - ideas for project framework - comments welcome - please use disscussion page
In no particular order ...
- Purpose - big picture vision and connection to TRU strategic goals and priorities - e.g. flexible learning, open learning methods and OER
- Timelines, roles and responsibilties
- Problem statement re status quo
- Environmental scan - LMS futures, textbook publishers, privacy, open educational practices, hardware devices, student trends, open source software
- SWOT analysis e.g. existing strengths and weaknesses of current model of development and delivery (OL, campus)
- High level goals/criteria and priorities
- Needs analysis
- Design approach - early iterations and feedback? Test environment? Decision points to launch larger project? Buy vs build, hybrid? Proprietary vs open? Etc....
- Functional requirements
- Methodology stakeholder engagement - transparency
- Assumptions and constraints e.g. range of options to be considered within scope of study
- Available resources
- Existing/historical resources and efforts
- Stakeholder analysis
- Use cases
- UI design considerations
- Scope of pilot
- Acceptance criteria/testing cycles/reviewers
- Training and support for stakeholders
- Resources for implementation and scaling
- Review of similar processes (e.g. SFU, JIBC, Fishbone - U Calgary D'Arcy Norman
- Project governance/structure (org chart)& decision matrix
- Documentation including GANTT chart, critical path, resources, timelines, milestones