Difference between revisions of "Teaching and Learning Resources Portal/Distance Technologies/OER"
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | TRU Open Ed Resources, Pt.1--Terry Anderson | ||
1. Open Scholars | 1. Open Scholars | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
3.OERs: | 3.OERs: | ||
+ | BC Campus Open Textbook | ||
+ | |||
+ | openstaxcollege.org/books | ||
oercommons.org | oercommons.org | ||
+ | |||
+ | cnx.org | ||
onlinebooks (u penn) | onlinebooks (u penn) | ||
Line 41: | Line 47: | ||
saylor.org "free education"--Saylor University | saylor.org "free education"--Saylor University | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | TRU Open Ed Resources Pt.2—Ron McGivern | ||
+ | |||
+ | --open access is part of our TRU Strategic Priorities | ||
+ | |||
+ | -open learning educational credit bank | ||
+ | |||
+ | -TRU Provost Fellow in Teaching and Learning: Melissa Jakubec | ||
+ | |||
+ | -open and flexible learning environments-e.g. Major in Criminology is Blended—contains some required OL courses—for budget reasons | ||
+ | |||
+ | -open access is required, as well as laddering so if people leave early they get a credential, aren’t just a ‘drop out’: exit and entry points | ||
+ | |||
+ | -OL mandate is to seek OER path first in curriculum development | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Open Ed Resource universitas: Collaboration & Transformation | ||
+ | Irwin DeVries | ||
+ | |||
+ | OERu=a global partnership, no longer using the word "university" | ||
+ | -committed to free courses & programs based on OERs: content is free, but feedback and support is not. It would be offered on a "fee for service" model that would cost less than usual tuition (why?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | -OERu located on WikiEducator. Here, whole course can be turned into a PDF and printed out if necessary. | ||
+ | |||
+ | -OERu's goal is to move away from relying PLAR for accreditation; the courses will be preapproved and then student will prove competency through an exam. "PLAR doesn't scale well." | ||
+ | |||
+ | -goal is to expand student body--students that wouldn't be taking courses otherwise | ||
+ | |||
+ | -"unbundles" local education--teacher, content, student don't have to be in the same place (?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | -Open design and development: | ||
+ | -involves using OER AND making OER | ||
+ | -encourages greater collaboration among faculty | ||
+ | |||
+ | -4R's: reuse, redistribute, revise, remix--& #5: retain | ||
+ | |||
+ | -OE practices | ||
+ | -Google Hangout | ||
+ | |||
+ | Rajiv Jhangiani, PhD | ||
+ | |||
+ | Open textbooks | ||
+ | |||
+ | -RJ was inspired by David Wylie's talk on open textbooks at last years OL workshop | ||
+ | |||
+ | -cost of textbooks has increased by 812% over 30 years!!! | ||
+ | -60%+ of students have decided against buy the textbook | ||
+ | |||
+ | Open Pedagogy: Wikipedia initiative | ||
+ | -"disposable assignments"=? time sinks | ||
+ | -"valuable assignments"=locate articles in Wikipedia, update & revise them, add citations and more balanced research. Fixing the problem of Wikipedia rather than railing against it | ||
+ | |||
+ | -instead of a 10 page term paper that takes a long time to grade (although the feedback may not be read by students), students can do something "real": e.g. add biographical entries to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum. Creating something useful. | ||
+ | |||
+ | -OpenStax | ||
+ | |||
+ | Advantages of using open textbooks: | ||
+ | -students save $ | ||
+ | -greater access and convenience for students | ||
+ | -instructors can adapt, update, & remix the source: increase of academic freedom | ||
+ | -better student performance & retention | ||
+ | -institutional advantages: easier to market courses and recruit students | ||
+ | -for practitioners of "open pedagogy" (i.e. someone who shares materials with colleagues), open textbooks allow you to live more closely in concert with your values | ||
+ | |||
+ | Practical suggestions: | ||
+ | -read the book reviews | ||
+ | -the texts can be edited in Word, but Pressbooks is better: Pressbooks is a flexible tool, document can be converted into any format | ||
+ | -you can delete cahpters or add/remove sections | ||
+ | -embed assignments & pedagogical goals=the equivalent of OL "course units" would be blended into the open textbook | ||
+ | -embed multimedia--bring textbook to life | ||
+ | -students will need to be guided in how to use the open textbook | ||
+ | -collect student feedback |
Latest revision as of 14:15, 31 May 2014
TRU Open Ed Resources, Pt.1--Terry Anderson 1. Open Scholars
-want to create persistent resources--still available after course end date
-Open Data Commons: NSERC, SSHRC grants require researchers to post data here
--Institutional Repository
--if it's not licensed, it's not open: license publications at Creative Commons. This doesn't mean you're giving up copyright. "Attribution" is the "gold standard" of OERs.
2. Open Access Journals are still peer-reviewed -they're going to depend on SSHRC (or other gov't funding)--but less of it. Then the resources will be used by more people.
-Directory of Open Access Journals
-you can't copyright an idea
copyright has restricted scientific development; patents would be more the issue now (my idea--drugs).
3.OERs:
BC Campus Open Textbook
openstaxcollege.org/books oercommons.org
cnx.org
onlinebooks (u penn)
Creative Commons
Google Advanced Search
MERLOT: Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching
P2PU
Khan Academy
4. Open Educational Practice -developing and applying open/public reaches and teaching, research and service practice -how do you implement oERs? select, reuse, evaluate
-in BC, there's an Open Textbook Initiative: BC Campus Open Ed
saylor.org "free education"--Saylor University
TRU Open Ed Resources Pt.2—Ron McGivern
--open access is part of our TRU Strategic Priorities
-open learning educational credit bank
-TRU Provost Fellow in Teaching and Learning: Melissa Jakubec
-open and flexible learning environments-e.g. Major in Criminology is Blended—contains some required OL courses—for budget reasons
-open access is required, as well as laddering so if people leave early they get a credential, aren’t just a ‘drop out’: exit and entry points
-OL mandate is to seek OER path first in curriculum development
Open Ed Resource universitas: Collaboration & Transformation
Irwin DeVries
OERu=a global partnership, no longer using the word "university" -committed to free courses & programs based on OERs: content is free, but feedback and support is not. It would be offered on a "fee for service" model that would cost less than usual tuition (why?)
-OERu located on WikiEducator. Here, whole course can be turned into a PDF and printed out if necessary.
-OERu's goal is to move away from relying PLAR for accreditation; the courses will be preapproved and then student will prove competency through an exam. "PLAR doesn't scale well."
-goal is to expand student body--students that wouldn't be taking courses otherwise
-"unbundles" local education--teacher, content, student don't have to be in the same place (?)
-Open design and development: -involves using OER AND making OER -encourages greater collaboration among faculty
-4R's: reuse, redistribute, revise, remix--& #5: retain
-OE practices -Google Hangout
Rajiv Jhangiani, PhD
Open textbooks
-RJ was inspired by David Wylie's talk on open textbooks at last years OL workshop
-cost of textbooks has increased by 812% over 30 years!!! -60%+ of students have decided against buy the textbook
Open Pedagogy: Wikipedia initiative -"disposable assignments"=? time sinks -"valuable assignments"=locate articles in Wikipedia, update & revise them, add citations and more balanced research. Fixing the problem of Wikipedia rather than railing against it
-instead of a 10 page term paper that takes a long time to grade (although the feedback may not be read by students), students can do something "real": e.g. add biographical entries to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum. Creating something useful.
-OpenStax
Advantages of using open textbooks: -students save $ -greater access and convenience for students -instructors can adapt, update, & remix the source: increase of academic freedom -better student performance & retention -institutional advantages: easier to market courses and recruit students -for practitioners of "open pedagogy" (i.e. someone who shares materials with colleagues), open textbooks allow you to live more closely in concert with your values
Practical suggestions: -read the book reviews -the texts can be edited in Word, but Pressbooks is better: Pressbooks is a flexible tool, document can be converted into any format -you can delete cahpters or add/remove sections -embed assignments & pedagogical goals=the equivalent of OL "course units" would be blended into the open textbook -embed multimedia--bring textbook to life -students will need to be guided in how to use the open textbook -collect student feedback