Difference between revisions of "Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group W"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Plaintiff was shot while fleeing from a bank robbery, plaintiff’s family brought: | Plaintiff was shot while fleeing from a bank robbery, plaintiff’s family brought: | ||
− | # | + | # Action against police chief was allowed to proceed (tort of misfeasance in a public office) |
− | # | + | # Action against Metropolitan Toronto Police Services Board was not (tort of misfeasance in a public office) |
− | # | + | # Action against the Province of Ontario was not (tort of misfeasance in a public office) for failing to ensure police officers involved were segregated, provided case notes, clothing and blood samples, and attended interviews with the SIU. |
Statement of claim alleges mental distress, anger, depression and anxiety as a consequence of the alleged misconduct, but the plaintiffs will have to prove at trial that the alleged misconduct caused anxiety or depression of sufficient magnitude to warrant compensation. | Statement of claim alleges mental distress, anger, depression and anxiety as a consequence of the alleged misconduct, but the plaintiffs will have to prove at trial that the alleged misconduct caused anxiety or depression of sufficient magnitude to warrant compensation. |
Revision as of 19:11, 9 February 2014
Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse
Plaintiff was shot while fleeing from a bank robbery, plaintiff’s family brought:
- Action against police chief was allowed to proceed (tort of misfeasance in a public office)
- Action against Metropolitan Toronto Police Services Board was not (tort of misfeasance in a public office)
- Action against the Province of Ontario was not (tort of misfeasance in a public office) for failing to ensure police officers involved were segregated, provided case notes, clothing and blood samples, and attended interviews with the SIU.
Statement of claim alleges mental distress, anger, depression and anxiety as a consequence of the alleged misconduct, but the plaintiffs will have to prove at trial that the alleged misconduct caused anxiety or depression of sufficient magnitude to warrant compensation.
Natural Law - St. Thomas Aquinas
Elements of Valid Law:
- Directed to Common Good
- Follow Practical Reason
- Must be Made by Valid Lawmaker
- Must be Promulgated
Legal Positivism
Classical Positivism - John Austin
Austin's Three Directives:
- God's law: "revealed" law; province of religion
- Positive morality: norms: manners, customs, club rules, international law, English constitutional law
- Has to be created in accordance with the rule of law making jurisdiction regarding the creation of law (pedigree test) (origin of the rule).
- Positive law: command, issued by superiors to subordinates, backed by sanctions
Post WWII Positivism - HLA Hart
Hart Criteria:
- Primary rules (tell us what is what isn't permitted)
- Secondary rules (rules that allow us to change the rules, adjudicate disputes about the rules, or figure out what the rules are)
- Rule of recognition (rules must be recognized by officials, must be applied by officials, and the officials must believe that they ought to apply them)