Course Development and Delivery Process
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This section focuses on the course development and delivery process. Please write your thoughts and comments anywhere you want - We will continue to work on clean up and refining this space over time.
We have generally divided the Development and Delivery process into 4 categories - Isses that relate to: Process, Information, Rules and People. For each of those four categories, we've identified below both What we know (or think we know) and What we need to find out. Do you agree with everything in the We Know list? Are there more things we still need to find out? Your input is required :)
Process
What we know (or think we know) | Thoughts/ Comments | What we need to find out | Thoughts/ Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Having a Master version of course then creating working copies for students is currently required (source content - 1:many) | How will any proposal interact with Banner? | Example | |
Current system has issues when making copies for master to working (permissions not translating, certain files do not come, additional structure added) making extra work for staff | How important is it that content is easily pulled out from LMS, exports in bulk in a usable format (not just backup file or “package”) | Example | |
A method to integrate content development into LMS as it is being developed is desired by some (development closer to final presentation) | How should content be chunked to best meet the needs of sutdents? | Example | |
Using HTML format provides fast access, potential sophisticated delivery of content for students | What is the best way to deliver content – integrated HTML /standalone ie downloadable documents? | Example | |
Current upload of content for OL is very efficient and flexible (XML & HTML & Scripting) – Production workflows – but general content development is not | What is the best way to edit content within the LMS? | Example | |
Our content currently uses aspects of LMS but is not truly within LMS (use external file formats) | How will files be accessed, deployed and replaced? | Example | |
Moving courses can be an onerous task Not all tools same between systems | How will our scripting processes need to be adjusted? | Example | |
How to interact/get better feedback loops with students and faculty within the LMS. | Example | ||
What major issues might we encounter? | Example | ||
How easily can we transfer existing courses from Blackboard into a new LMS? | Example | ||
How significantly might we need to alter a typical course when moving from Blackboard to a different LMS? | Example | ||
Do students prefer to have material grouped by type or time or both? | Example | ||
Example | Example | ||
Example | What is the best way to structure content within the LMS? | Example | |
Example | Example | Example |
==
Information ==
What we know (or think we know) | Thoughts/ Comments | What we need to find out | Thoughts/ Comments |
---|---|---|---|
LMS Systems do not version content – no going back once change committed. | Example | Example | Example |
Most of our current courses (OL) contain Blackboard specific content or references. | Example | Example | Example |
A handful of our current courses still contain references to the previous LMS. | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Rules
What we know (or think we know) | Thoughts/ Comments | What we need to find out | Thoughts/ Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Some of the material in our courses has to be behind a secure fire wall (copyright clearance restrictions) | Example | Who will maintain the system? | Example |
Choice of learning tool determines how content designed/added to environment | Example | Are we wanting to make content “open”? | Example |
OL has used the LMS within course navigation options for student navigation (not added our own) | Example | Can a system be both closed and open? | Example |
OL has used external styling for its course pages (not using internal themes) | Example | Are we trying to keep a new LMS similar to Learn as we did last time? | Example |
Very limited control of working environment by end users and difficult to get feedback and help from system administrators | Example | Should external resources (cleared documents) be put on a secure server away from course (handled like media)? | Example |
We have to be considerate of collective agreement | Example | What collective agreement issues do we need to consider? | Example |
We need to be considerate of copyright | Example | What copyright issues to we need to consider? | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
Example | Example | Example | Example |
People
What we know (or think we know) | Thoughts/ Comments | What we need to find out | Thoughts/ Comments |
---|---|---|---|
We (Staff) have experience using multiple different learning management systems/environments | Example | Example | Example |
We will need to train | Example | Example | Example |
Change will always come with resistance, regardless of benefits. | Example | Example | Example |
Best practices of introducing a new system – emerging practices | Example | Example | Example |
Learning new management systems take time | Example | Example | Example |
New systems may not be adopted wholeheartedly by all involved | Example | Example | Example |
Have not communicated what they can and cannot change in processes | Example | Example | Example |
Our ID’s and OLFM’s are familiar with tools provided or have means to find more information, know what they want and how to design for and use | Example | Example | Example |
It has been difficult or intimidating for OLFM’s to adjust current interface when they are required to do so | Example | Example | Example |