Difference between revisions of "Lms notes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Project framework discussion == '''Present''' - Naomi, Carolyn, Michelle, Irwin <br> '''Framework discussion''' Purpose - ideas for project framework - comments welcome - pl...") |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In no particular order ... | In no particular order ... | ||
* Purpose - big picture vision and connection to TRU strategic goals and priorities - e.g. flexible learning, open learning methods and OER | * Purpose - big picture vision and connection to TRU strategic goals and priorities - e.g. flexible learning, open learning methods and OER | ||
| − | * | + | * High level goals/criteria and priorities |
| + | * Existing/historical resources and efforts | ||
* Problem statement re status quo | * Problem statement re status quo | ||
| − | * Environmental scan - LMS futures, textbook publishers, privacy, open educational practices, hardware devices, student trends, open source software | + | * Needs analysis |
| + | * Functional requirements | ||
| + | * External: Environmental scan - LMS futures, textbook publishers, privacy, open educational practices, hardware devices, student trends, open source software | ||
* SWOT analysis e.g. existing strengths and weaknesses of current model of development and delivery (OL, campus) | * SWOT analysis e.g. existing strengths and weaknesses of current model of development and delivery (OL, campus) | ||
| − | * | + | * Stakeholder analysis |
| − | * | + | * Use cases |
| + | * UI design considerations | ||
| + | |||
* Design approach - early iterations and feedback? Test environment? Decision points to launch larger project? Buy vs build, hybrid? Proprietary vs open? Etc.... | * Design approach - early iterations and feedback? Test environment? Decision points to launch larger project? Buy vs build, hybrid? Proprietary vs open? Etc.... | ||
| − | + | ||
* Methodology stakeholder engagement - transparency | * Methodology stakeholder engagement - transparency | ||
* Assumptions and constraints e.g. range of options to be considered within scope of study | * Assumptions and constraints e.g. range of options to be considered within scope of study | ||
* Available resources | * Available resources | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* Scope of pilot | * Scope of pilot | ||
* Acceptance criteria/testing cycles/reviewers | * Acceptance criteria/testing cycles/reviewers | ||
| Line 27: | Line 30: | ||
* Project governance/structure (org chart)& decision matrix | * Project governance/structure (org chart)& decision matrix | ||
* Documentation including GANTT chart, critical path, resources, timelines, milestones | * Documentation including GANTT chart, critical path, resources, timelines, milestones | ||
| + | * Timelines, roles and responsibilties | ||
Latest revision as of 14:20, 28 October 2014
Project framework discussion
Present - Naomi, Carolyn, Michelle, Irwin
Framework discussion
Purpose - ideas for project framework - comments welcome - please use disscussion page
In no particular order ...
- Purpose - big picture vision and connection to TRU strategic goals and priorities - e.g. flexible learning, open learning methods and OER
- High level goals/criteria and priorities
- Existing/historical resources and efforts
- Problem statement re status quo
- Needs analysis
- Functional requirements
- External: Environmental scan - LMS futures, textbook publishers, privacy, open educational practices, hardware devices, student trends, open source software
- SWOT analysis e.g. existing strengths and weaknesses of current model of development and delivery (OL, campus)
- Stakeholder analysis
- Use cases
- UI design considerations
- Design approach - early iterations and feedback? Test environment? Decision points to launch larger project? Buy vs build, hybrid? Proprietary vs open? Etc....
- Methodology stakeholder engagement - transparency
- Assumptions and constraints e.g. range of options to be considered within scope of study
- Available resources
- Scope of pilot
- Acceptance criteria/testing cycles/reviewers
- Training and support for stakeholders
- Resources for implementation and scaling
- Review of similar processes (e.g. SFU, JIBC, Fishbone - U Calgary D'Arcy Norman
- Project governance/structure (org chart)& decision matrix
- Documentation including GANTT chart, critical path, resources, timelines, milestones
- Timelines, roles and responsibilties