Documentation:Learning Design/Gail's Assessment Page

From Kumu Wiki - TRU
< Documentation:Learning Design
Revision as of 14:41, 6 May 2014 by Smauricio (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Online Discussion Criteria

Criteria 8-10 marks 5-7 marks 0-4 marks
Quality of posting Sound evidence that student has done course readings and has a thorough knowledge of discussion topic Evidence that most of course readings done and student has some knowledge of discussion topic Minor evidence that course readings were done and student understands discussion topic
Communication Skills Postings are clear, concise and easy to understand Postings are usually, but not always clear, concise and easy to understand Postings are too short/long and/or unclear and hard to understand
Critical Thinking and Self-reflection Exceptionally well- supported, thoughtful, insightful comments made on others’ and own postings Some evidence of critical thought and self-reflection on others’ and own postings Minor evidence of critical thought and reflection on others’ and own postings


Peer Review Rubric The main purpose of the peer review exercises is for you to use the various checklists given in your text, evaluate the content, design, supplementary materials and delivery of your peers' presentation in an objective and helpful manner, and to provide some written feedback to them. This skill of critiquing a presentation should assist you as you work on your own presentation for this unit, and on future presentations you may do in your line of work.The criteria for this peer review is as follows:

Criteria

Careful, accurate completion of Chapter 10, 11, 12 checklists

Written comments that are specific, helpful, respectful and positive

Total



Final Presentation Rubric

The Open Learning Faculty Member will use the same Chapter 10, 11, 12 checklists from the text to evaluate and comment on the content, design, supplementary materials and delivery of each student's presentation. Students will receive some written feedback from their OLFM about the strengths and weaknesses of their final presentation. The criteria to be used is as follows:


Criteria

Chapter 10 checklist criteria about content and organization of presentation

Chapter 11 checklist criteria about supporting materials used in presentation

Chapter 12 checklist criteria about elements of delivery (visual, vocal, verbal)