Difference between revisions of "Documentation:Learning Environment/OLFM Workshop Feedback"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
92 decks were returned | 92 decks were returned | ||
| + | |||
11 were returned empty | 11 were returned empty | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
== The Results == | == The Results == | ||
| − | + | [[File:Https://kumu.tru.ca/File:Wordle of OLFM Workshop Feedback.png|left]] | |
| − | |||
| − | File: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 12:41, 20 May 2015
OLFM 2015 Workshop Presentation
May 9th, 2015 Ken, Brian and Tanya presented the Future Learning Environment Discussion
A 15 page deck was provided to each OLFM to follow along with. The OLFMs were asked to put a sticky note on the items/features they wanted and were encouraged to provide feedback by writing in the deck. The presentation ran out of time and ended before discussing #5 Content Display. Although it was not reviewed in detail, many OLFMs continued through the deck and provided their feedback. The number of respondents to Section 5 and 6 are expected to be much lower than 1-4.
92 decks were returned
11 were returned empty
The feedback was compiled based on two factors: Likes and comments
- The number of sticky notes and positive comments for each feature was considered a like.
- Some decks were returned only with comments, suggestions or questions and were not considered in the like category but the comments were recorded.
- If a comment was not in favour of a feature that a sticky was on, it was not considered a like and the comment was recorded
