Difference between revisions of "Gregory's Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* They are all reputable physicians and work in the field of neonatology | * They are all reputable physicians and work in the field of neonatology | ||
* Have published multiple papers and other topics on UpToDate | * Have published multiple papers and other topics on UpToDate | ||
− | || | + | || |
+ | * Yes the authors, chief editor and contributors names are present | ||
+ | * They are all Physicians working and teaching in pediatrics | ||
+ | * They have stated that they have nothing to disclose | ||
+ | * Additional information is provided with medical societies they are members of | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * Yes the authors of the articles names are present | ||
+ | * They are all Physicians working and teaching in pediatrics | ||
+ | * A Google search, provides additional information, resumes and other publications. | ||
+ | * They have stated that they have nothing to disclose | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * Yes the authors of the articles “NAVA Ventilation in Neonates: Clinical Guidelines and Management Strategies” are stated | ||
+ | * The authors are a Physicians and respiratory therapist who clinically work with NAVA | ||
+ | * The authors have published multiple papers on the topic and H Stein is regarded as one of the leading experts in the field | ||
+ | || Example || do we think this will work at all || Example | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''What is the purpose of the website?''' | | '''What is the purpose of the website?''' | ||
Line 22: | Line 36: | ||
* The site is evidence-based, physician-authored educational site | * The site is evidence-based, physician-authored educational site | ||
* It is a clinical decision support resource that is meant to help clinicians care for their patients | * It is a clinical decision support resource that is meant to help clinicians care for their patients | ||
− | || | + | || |
+ | * The site is an evidence-based, educational site | ||
+ | * Provide educational information to health care providers | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * This is a refutable medical journal | ||
+ | * The article is a European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants – 2010 Update | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * The article is published in a NEONATOLOGY TODAY a free monthly newsletter | ||
+ | * Its purpose is to provide neonatologist with news and information | ||
+ | || Example || Example || Example | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
| '''When was the information published?''' | | '''When was the information published?''' | ||
* When was the information created? | * When was the information created? | ||
* When was the information last updated? | * When was the information last updated? | ||
|| | || | ||
− | * There is no creation date, however the review states it was last updated in Oct 2012 and was reviewed for currency in Sept 2014 || | + | * There is no creation date, however the review states it was last updated in Oct 2012 and was reviewed for currency in Sept 2014 |
+ | || | ||
+ | * There is no creation date, however the review states it was last updated in Sept 2012 | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * The article was published in June 2010 | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * The article was published in April 2012 | ||
+ | || Example || Example || Example | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
| '''Where did the information come from?''' | | '''Where did the information come from?''' | ||
* What supports the information found on the website? | * What supports the information found on the website? | ||
* If there a reference list? | * If there a reference list? | ||
|| | || | ||
− | * The information is evidence based and referenced || | + | * The information is evidence based and referenced |
+ | || | ||
+ | * The information is evidence based and referenced | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * The information provided is evidence based and referenced | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | The information provided is evidence based and referenced || Example || Example || Example | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 44: | Line 84: | ||
* Yes the information found on this site is trustworthy and up to date (as the name suggests). | * Yes the information found on this site is trustworthy and up to date (as the name suggests). | ||
* There is no bias, advertising or conflict | * There is no bias, advertising or conflict | ||
− | || | + | || |
+ | * The information found on this site is trustworthy and evidence based | ||
+ | * There appears to be no bias in the information provided, however the site does contain advertising | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * The information found in the paper is evidence based | ||
+ | * There appears to be no bias in the information provided, however the site does contain advertising | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * The information found in the paper is evidence based | ||
+ | * As this is a free newsletter the site is heavily advertised | ||
+ | * Although there is no mention of it, the authors would most likely have a close relationship with the ventilator company | ||
+ | || Example || Example || Example | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 09:35, 26 October 2014
Website | UpToDate | Medscape | Neonatology | Neonatology Today | NICU University | MerkManual | Quizlet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Who wrote the material?
|
|
|
|
|
Example | do we think this will work at all | Example |
What is the purpose of the website?
|
|
|
|
|
Example | Example | Example |
When was the information published?
|
|
|
|
|
Example | Example | Example |
Where did the information come from?
|
|
|
|
The information provided is evidence based and referenced || Example || Example || Example | |||
Why should I trust the information?
|
|
|
|
|
Example | Example | Example |
Objectivity
Is the information presented with a minimum of bias? To what extent is the resource trying to sway the opinion of the audience using rhetorical skills (appeals to emotion etc.) instead of logic? |
Example | Example | Example | Example | Example | Example | Example |