Difference between revisions of "Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group X"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
'''''E.B v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia''''' | '''''E.B v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia''''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Facts''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | From 1957 to 1962, the appellant E.B. was a student at a residnetial school in British Columbia which was run by the respondents, the Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia. During this period, the appellant suffered routine sexual abuse at the hands of Martin Saxey, a lay employee at the school. The appellant seeks damages from the respondents because of direct liability in allowing such abuse to occur, and also vicarious liability for the actions of Saxey as an employee. | ||
[[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/Natural_Law]] | [[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/Natural_Law]] | ||
Revision as of 12:50, 7 February 2014
E.B v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia
Facts
From 1957 to 1962, the appellant E.B. was a student at a residnetial school in British Columbia which was run by the respondents, the Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia. During this period, the appellant suffered routine sexual abuse at the hands of Martin Saxey, a lay employee at the school. The appellant seeks damages from the respondents because of direct liability in allowing such abuse to occur, and also vicarious liability for the actions of Saxey as an employee.
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/Natural_Law
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/Positivism
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/Separation_Thesis
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/System_Of_Rights
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/Liberty-Paternalism
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/Law_As_Efficiency
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/Feminist_Jurisprudence
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_X/Critical_Legal_Studies_Critical_Race_Theory