Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group R/Feminist Jurisprudence

From Kumu Wiki - TRU
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction to Feminist Jurisprudence

The feminist approach to jurisprudence is both modern and multi-dimensional. The diversity within the theory itself stems from being centred around the "lived experiences of women"[1]. No two people are alike, and thus a theory which champions the different perspectives and experiences of all women is inherently complex with many different approaches and ideas.

Despite the differences that exist there are underlying concepts which are core to the theory of feminist jurisprudence. [2] Two of these fundamental core concepts are; the world as we know it is structured by patriarchy.[3] and patriarchy is bad for women, it is morally unjustified, and should be eliminated[4]

Many of the differences amongst feminist theorists stems from the second concept, and disagreements over how to change the existing status quo of a society structured by patriarch.

Evolution of the Feminist Theory

Response to Feminist Critiques

One critique of feminism is that it can be reduced to the theories that inform it, for example, liberalism. Such critics argue that feminism neglects to bring any new ideas to the theoretical table. A response to this critique has been to acknowledge one of the essential tenets of feminism, the rejection of the patriarchy. [5] The rejection of the patriarchy is an element to the theory that distinguishes it from all the others.

Another critique which arises from this point, is that a theory only concerned with the rejection of the patriarchy is not very interesting or thought provoking [6] Feminists would argue that this idea of the patriarchy is wrong as a rejection of the patriarchy is a revolutionary change.[7] It can even be stated as being a "paradigm shift" in thinking.[8]

A difficulty in categorizing the feminist theory as revolutionary is that the response to revolutionary shiffts in thinking is often negative. People respond to revolutionary change by neglecting to take such ideas seriously. They are met by ridicule or even fear.

As the response to feminism as a revolutionary shift in thinking is often too large for people to grasp, feminists have tended to focus on specific issues that pertain to women rather than the general underlying critique of the patriarchal system.[9]

Toward Feminist Jurisprudence

Application to B.M v British Columbia (Attorney General)


  1. Dimock at 139
  2. Dimock, 139
  3. Dimock, 140
  4. Dimock, 140
  5. Dimock 146
  6. Dimock at 147
  7. Dimock at 147
  8. Dimock at 147
  9. Dimock at 148