Difference between revisions of "Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group I"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Griffinr13 (talk | contribs) |
Griffinr13 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | =''E. (Mrs.) v. Eve'', [1986] 2 S.C.R. 388= | ||
| + | |||
| + | This page considers and discusses how a variety of dominant theoretical legal perspectives, illustrate and explain the key issues in the case ''E. (Mrs.) v. Eve'', and how the approaches taken by the court parallels and contrasts with these various perspectives. The theoretical perspectives to be discussed are as follows: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Example || Example || Example || Example | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Example || Example || Example || Example | ||
| + | |} | ||
[[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Natural_Law]] | [[Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Natural_Law]] | ||
Revision as of 12:10, 14 March 2014
E. (Mrs.) v. Eve, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 388
This page considers and discusses how a variety of dominant theoretical legal perspectives, illustrate and explain the key issues in the case E. (Mrs.) v. Eve, and how the approaches taken by the court parallels and contrasts with these various perspectives. The theoretical perspectives to be discussed are as follows:
| Example | Example | Example | Example |
| Example | Example | Example | Example |
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Natural_Law
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Positivism
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Separation_Thesis
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/System_Of_Rights
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Liberty-Paternalism
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Law_As_Efficiency
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Feminist_Jurisprudence
Course:Law3020/2014WT1/Group_I/Critical_Legal_Studies_Critical_Race_Theory